Joe Cole claims Postecoglou made major selection error against Wolves
Given their extensive list of suspensions and injuries, which included four of their most important players in James Maddison, Cristian Romero, Micky van de Ven, and Destiny Udogie, the match at Molineux Stadium was always going to be a tough one for the Spurs.
The Lilywhites’ performance was predictably the dullest of the season thus far, and just when it looked like they would somehow win all three points, Wolves scored twice in stoppage time to condemn Postecoglou’s team to their second consecutive loss.
Does Giovani Lo Celso need to start next game?
Cole asserted that Tottenham is still lagging behind teams like Manchester City and Arsenal because they don’t have any good backup players for their starting players.
The former Chelsea player said to TNT Sports following Spurs’ 2-1 defeat, “I didn’t consider them as title contenders; it’s a lesson for teams.” There is no room for mercy in the Premier League, even if you win seven or nine games.
A number of their key players left, and some of the newcomers are still developing. Before the international break, they may have gained some momentum if they had gained a point. For the league, however, they are far from it.
Said Man City could simply replace De Bruyne if he were to lose him. With players like Gabriel Martinelli and Leandro Trossard still available, Arsenal is currently in the second stage of the Spurs development process. Replicas of the same caliber do not exist at Tottenham.
Cole said the Spurs could have done with Lo Celso beginning the game and that they missed Maddison’s inventiveness in the center of the park.
“Tottenham’s defensive portion of their game was good,” he continued. Ben Davies and Eric Dier both had strong performances. However, Maddison was sorely missed. Ange will think about it and insert Hojbjerg.
Maybe he ought to have placed Giovani Lo Celso. Although I think Ange is great, I believe he should have included Lo Celso for a little bit more authority and control.
It must be said that, with all the stuff we’ve heard about the Australian never sacrificing on his style of play, I was a little taken aback when Ange decided to start Hojbjerg instead of Maddison for Lo Celso.
The counterargument to that, though, is that even with the additional defensive insurance the Dane provided in the center of the mark, we appeared to be rather exposed at the back. So, had Lo Celso started, it could have been even simpler to get to our backline.